Wk. 5 Summative Assessment: Critical Thinking: Reflection

Critical thinking reflection

Reliability, feeling, logic, and effective communication are essential aspects of critical thinking. Critical thinking frequently starts with an emotion of some type. That leads to the development of trust, reason, and communication. The reliability of a proposition depends on it having factual facts. Depending on your audience, it would be best to employ defense when deciding how to convey it. Additionally, you ought to be able to communicate effectively and explain your strategy so that everyone can understand. Sally would not even be able to demonstrate the proposal regarding the guaranteed extension and subsequently get it authorized without these elements.

Elements of Critical Thinking

Applying the principles of critical thinking to a problem typically yields favorable results since it ensures that all relevant factors have been considered before drawing a logical conclusion. There were obstacles to critical thinking in this situation. Sally, for instance, demonstrated conformity when she nodded in seeming agreement at the meal with coworkers rather than expressing her dissatisfaction. In this regard, Sally didn’t reveal her capacity for critical thought; instead, she showed it by submitting to her coworkers’ wishes to prevent a conflict. Later, when she presented the manager with an argument supported by facts, she developed critical thinking skills. The warranty was eventually extended because of her persistence despite the manager’s use of fallacies to repel her. When Sally’s manager rejected her results without offering a convincing defense after learning that the printer guarantee was insufficient, he demonstrated a type of reluctance to critical thinking. Despite having access to all the information, the manager chose not to learn more about the situation, revealing his ignorance.

Reason, Emotion, and Communication

Logic, feelings, and communication must all be used in critical thinking. Being effective in all these areas improves one’s capacity for critical thought. In this case, Sally provided proof to support her argument that the 1-year warranty offered by the printer was insufficient. She also determined how many consumers who had malfunctioning printers bought replacements. After work, Sally was irritated and exhausted. Her emotional state limited her ability to reason, and Sally lacked the self-assurance to express her views to her coworkers. Despite not agreeing with her colleague’s viewpoint, she still seems to have been a passive communicator since she did so to avoid a confrontation.

Fallacies and Argument

Arguments that include fallacies frequently turn deceitful and contain illogical or misleading justifications—a few misconceptions presented throughout this critical thinking scenario. Furthermore, there is the customer’s use of Sally as a pawn in the sympathy fallacy. It was done by sally invoking his skill to print as the only means of ensuring that his family would eat to appeal to Sally’s fascist sympathies. Second, instead of addressing the root causes of Sally’s delay, her employer made the ad hominem mistake by attacking her. The primary debate in this reading concerned whether the company’s printer warranty was appropriate, given that it did not give buyers enough time to determine if the equipment would function as intended. The allegation is legitimate because Sally offered proof that numerous printers broke only one month after the one-year guarantee ended.

Conclusion

When critical thinking is employed to debunk a claim, a successful outcome is almost certainly to be expected. Using the abilities needed to develop critical thinking, one might overcome obstacles in the way of one’s ability to think critically. Even when fallacies are introduced, using sound reasoning techniques and effective communication will help you win most arguments. Emotions have the potential to either support or undermine critical thinking. When making decisions, emotions cannot take precedence over rationality since logical reasons given may be disregarded.