Medical anthropology and other relevant disciplines

Has the Covid-19 pandemic changed everything or has it made the familiar clearer?

“In different ways and for different reasons, a sense that the COVID-19 pandemic has changed everything has come to dominate public, personal, and intellectual life…The social entanglements it created have been both for better and for worse, but they have always exceeded the pathogen’s physical effects on bodies. Anthropologists recognize in these patterns not only a rupture but also the familiar as if what can be seen now is not new but has simply been made clearer.” (Adams and Nading 2020: 461).

Vincanne Adams and Alex Nading (2020) ‘Medical Anthropology in the Time of COVID-19’. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 34(4): 461–466.

1. Like many essay questions, there are two sides to explore in order to answer this essay well. It is worth developing an outline that takes into account both sides.

2. When you have made the first draft, consider the following questions:
a. Does your essay answer a question?
– or does it just give interesting information (without answering the question)?
– does it give evidence of having thought carefully and deeply about the question, considering it from different angles? (e.g. what, when, where, who, how, why?)

b. Is your essay research-led?
– have you read and used relevant work published in medical anthropology and other relevant disciplines as evidence/examples? Peer-reviewed journals and ethnographic monographs are particularly good. Are these appropriately and consistently referenced (e.g. using the Harvard, Chicago or Vancouver styles – see ‘Cite them Right’ for further information).
– have you critically evaluated what you have read, questioning the author, e.g. their purpose, methods used, strength of argument, possible bias etc. and communicating their opinion of it?
– are you aware of key approaches/perspectives / theoretical standpoints that medical anthropologists might have taken regarding the topic? Have you been suitably reflexive about your own experience and how it links to relevant concepts and approaches in medical anthropology?

3. Is your writing clear (grammatically and logically)? Does the essay use effective orienting sentences that refer back to the question and justify the relevance of what is being discussed?
Do you agree? Give reasons for your answer, drawing on relevant concepts and approaches introduced in Health, Illness and Society Part 1 as well as your personal experience.

Reduction of causes of frequent fall among clients 65 years and older in the home setting

Reduction of causes of frequent fall among clients 65 years and older in the home setting

After reading Chapter 8 in the Curley ebook, consider and reflect on the history of the Quality improvement movement and the excellent resources, including;

  • the Quality improvement Essential Toolkit
  • Curley’s discussion of Nurse-Sensitive Process and Outcome Indicators and the HEDIS measures.

Framing your Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) project to better grasp how to evaluate this practice at the population level, taking us to the 21st Century and discuss the following:

1. What measurements would be important to framing a DNP practice problem, and how would you go about doing this for the patients you will be working with ( community, primary care, hospital?)

2. How could you determine, more specifically, the nature of the problem from a measurement standpoint?

3. What is the gap in practice at your organization and what QI tools could be used to measure the problem and can shed insight?

The use of non-opioid modalities

PICO – In injured veterans experiencing chronic pain (P), does the use of non-opioid modalities (Pharmacological and Non-pharmacological) (I), compared to the administration of systemic opioids (C), lead to improved pain management and decreased incidence of opioid overdose (O)?

Radiographic evidence of osteoporosis

A 78-year-old female was out walking her small dog when her dog suddenly tried to chase a rabbit and made her fall. She attempted to try and break her fall by putting her hand out and she landed on her outstretched hand. She immediately felt severe pain in her right wrist and noticed her wrist looked deformed. Her neighbor saw the fall and brought the woman to the local ER for evaluation. Radiographs revealed a Colles’ fracture (distal radius with dorsal displacement of fragments) as well as radiographic evidence of osteoporosis. A closed reduction of the fracture was successful, and she was placed in a posterior splint with an ace bandage wrap and instructed to see an orthopedist for a follow-up.

Question:
Discuss what is osteoporosis and how does it develop pathologically?

The current healthcare dynamics leading to curriculum design

Historical factors and the current healthcare dynamics leading to curriculum design, implementation, and evaluation.

Reflect upon the historical factors and the current healthcare dynamics that lead to curriculum design, implementation, and evaluation.

Write a 1500-2000 word essay addressing each of the following points/questions. Be sure to answer all the questions for each bullet point completely. There should be five sections, one for each bullet below. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you address in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least five (5) sources in your essay.
Make sure to reference the citations using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page do not count towards the minimum word amount. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.

Reflect upon the historical factors and the current healthcare dynamics that lead to curriculum design, implementation, and evaluation.

1-)Conduct a literature search on EBSCO and/or CINAHL related to the history and evolution of nursing curricula.
2.)Summarize two key events. How do past, present, and future events frame curriculum?
3.)Compare and contrast the different types of curricula that prepare entry-level nurses.
4.)Describe two innovative curriculum and/or teaching strategies for implementing the curriculum.
5.)List one or two barriers to implementing a curriculum, identify strategies to overcome t

Comparing Philosophical Approaches: Plato and Aristotle

Comparing Philosophical Approaches: Plato and Aristotle
Can we trust what we see, hear, and feel? Do our senses tell us how the world “really” is? Or is there a different reality that our senses cannot fully help us comprehend? Both Plato and Aristotle grappled with these questions, and each philosopher settled on his own theory. In this assignment, you will explore Plato’s theory of rationalism as well as Aristotle’s theory of empiricism. You will then connect one of these two theories with your own experience.To prepare for this Discussion:Complete Interactive Unit 2, Module 1, titled “The Meaning of Philosophy.” Pay particular attention to the pages in which Plato and Aristotle are discussed.
To complete this Discussion:

By Day 4
Post to the Discussion board the following:

A description of the philosophical approach of the Rationalists (represented by Plato) and the Empiricists (represented by Aristotle). As part of your descriptions, identify at least two ways in which these approaches differ from one another.
A paragraph in which you select either Rationalism or Empiricism as the approach that resonates most deeply with your personal experiences. Support your selection with an example from your own life.

UNIT 1, Module 1, “The Meaning of Philosophy.” Pay particular attention to the pages in which Plato ans Aristotle are discussed.

The Philosophical Perspective Introduction
Introduction

In this course, we will explore the discipline of Philosophy as the pursuit of wisdom. Throughout our lives, we all seek wisdom in different ways. In this course, we will focus on the quest for knowledge in our relationship with others, our contact with the objective world, and our relationship with ourselves.

These three fundamental ways of pursuing wisdom through relating to the world, to others, and to ourselves are known as the practice of “critique,” the practice of “dialogue,” and the practice of “self-examination,” respectively. Throughout the course, we will continually refer back to these fundamental practices to remind us of the meaning that philosophy has in all the various aspects of our lives.

The philosophical tradition that we will be studying began with the practice of dialogue in ancient Greece. The first texts we will encounter in this course are Plato’s dialogues — passages presented as a series of conversations between two partners who are seeking answers to tough questions of their day, such as the question, “What is justice?” Dialogue, however, as the ancient philosophers discovered, gives way to questions about the world around us.

All human beings, Aristotle says, seek knowledge. Since human beings are always seeking knowledge, we are also continually making claims about the world around us. The problem, however, is that everyone— by being human—has claimed about the world.

When engaging others in dialogue, we often run into the problem that others do not agree with our claims about the world. The task of philosophy beyond discussion, therefore, is to find out which claims about the world are true and which are false. This practice is known as critique—allowing examination of one’s claims and views about the world in light of the evidence, reason, and argument.

However, as both ancient and modern philosophers discovered, wonder about the world around us eventually come back to the inquiry of our role in the world—the question of ourselves. For, after all, if so many people disagree about the reality of the external world, how can I be sure that there exists an external world apart from my perception? Does the world live as I see it precisely, or is there something more to it? Is there an objective world apart from my limited understanding, or are my beliefs about the world all that matter? This problem is one that caused both Plato and Descartes to wonder. For both philosophers, this question led to the third sphere of philosophical practice: self-examination.

In this way, we will approach the study of philosophy in this course as a pursuit of wisdom in our encounters with others (dialogue), in our contacts with the external world (critique), and in our meeting with ourselves (self-examination).

At the end of this lesson, students will be able to:

Explain concepts central to philosophical inquiry.
Describe Western philosophical tradition and timelines.
Identify significant figures in the birth of philosophy in ancient Greece.
Describe critiques, opinions, arguments, and the Socratic Method.
Describe the building blocks of logic and the structure of an argument.
Explain how to classify and evaluate an argument.
Describe the traditional branches of philosophy.
Distinguish different forms of philosophical skepticism.
Describe the types of continental and analytic philosophy.

Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Disorders

Quiz – Module 3 Knowledge Check
Knowledge Check: Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Disorders

• In this exercise, you will complete 5-essay-type questions in the Knowledge Check to gauge your understanding of this module’s content.
• Each question will hold one to two parts asked to be addressed and each part will need at least one citation, at least two citations if asked two parts to the question from the textbook and/or current peer-reviewed journals.
• Each question is worth 4 points. I would expect substantive paragraphs per answer (a paragraph would include 6-10 sentences).

KC each essay needs a citation(s) and reference(s), if using textbook apply correct page(s)
Basic book citation format
The APA in-text citation for a book includes the author’s last name, the year, and (if relevant) a page number.
In the reference list, start with the author’s last name and initials, followed by the year. The book title is written in sentence case (only capitalize the first word and any proper nouns). Include any other contributors (e.g. editors and translators) and the edition if specified (e.g. “2nd ed.”).
Format Last name, Initials. (Year). Book title (Editor/translator initials, Last name, Ed. or Trans.) (Edition). Publisher.
Reference entry Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origins and spread of nationalism. Verso.
In-text citation (Anderson, 1983, p. 23)

Possible topics covered in this Knowledge Check include:
• Ulcers
• Hepatitis markers
• After HP shots
• Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
• Pancreatitis
• Liver failure—acute and chronic
• Gall bladder disease
• Inflammatory bowel disease
• Diverticulitis
• Jaundice
• Bilirubin
• Gastrointestinal bleed – upper and lower
• Hepatic encephalopathy
• Intra-abdominal infections (e.g., appendicitis)
• Renal blood flow
• Glomerular filtration rate
• Kidney stones
• Infections – urinary tract infections, pyelonephritis
• Acute kidney injury
• Renal failure – acute and chronic

QUESTION 1
1. Scenario 1: Peptic Ulcer
A 65-year-old female comes to the clinic with a complaint of abdominal pain in the epigastric area. The pain has been persistent for two weeks. The pain described as burning, non-radiating and worse after meals. Denies N&V, weight loss or obvious bleeding. She admits to frequent belching with bloating.
PMH: seasonal allergies with Chronic Sinusitis, positive for osteoarthritis,
Meds: Claritin 10 mg po daily, ibuprofen 400-600 mg po prn pain
Family Hx-non contributary
Social history: Separated recently pending divorce; stressful situation with trying to manage two homes. Works as a Legal Assistant at a local law firm. She has 35 PPY of smoking, drinks 1-2 glasses of wine a day, and 6-7 cups of coffee per day. She denies illicit drug use, vaping or unprotected sexual encounters.
Breath test in the office revealed urease.
The healthcare provider suspects the client has peptic ulcer disease.
Questions:
1. Explain what contributed to the development from this patient’s history of PUD?

QUESTION 2
1. Scenario 1: Peptic Ulcer
A 65-year-old female comes to the clinic with a complaint of abdominal pain in the epigastric area. The pain has been persistent for two weeks. The pain described as burning, non-radiating and worse after meals. Denies N&V, weight loss or obvious bleeding. She admits to frequent belching with bloating.
PMH: seasonal allergies with Chronic Sinusitis, positive for osteoarthritis,
Meds: Claritin 10 mg po daily, ibuprofen 400-600 mg po prn pain
Family Hx-non contributary
Social history: Separated recently pending divorce; stressful situation with trying to manage two homes. Works as a Legal Assistant at a local law firm. She has 35 PPY of smoking, drinks 1-2 glasses of wine a day, and 6-7 cups of coffee per day. She denies illicit drug use, vaping or unprotected sexual encounters.
Breath test in the office revealed urease.
The healthcare provider suspects the client has peptic ulcer disease.
Question:
1. What is the pathophysiology of PUD/ formation of peptic ulcers?

QUESTION 3
1. Scenario 2: Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)
A 44-year-old morbidly obese female comes to the clinic complaining of “burning in my chest and a funny taste in my mouth”. The symptoms have been present for years but patient states she had been treating the symptoms with antacid tablets which helped until the last 4 or 5 weeks. She never saw a healthcare provider for that. She says the symptoms get worse at night when she is lying down and has had to sleep with 2 pillows. She says she has started coughing at night which has been interfering with her sleep. She denies palpitations, shortness of breath, or nausea.
PMH-HTN, venous stasis ulcers, irritable bowel syndrome, osteoarthritis of knees, morbid obesity (BMI 48 kg/m2)
FH:non contributary
Medications: Lisinopril 10 mg po qd, Bentyl 10 mg po, ibuprofen 800 mg po q 6 hr prn
SH: 20 PPY of smoking, ETOH rarely, denies vaping
Diagnoses: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

Question:
1. If the client asks what causes GERD how would you explain this as a provider?

QUESTION 4
1. Scenario 3: Upper GI Bleed
A 64-year-old male presents the clinic with complaints of passing dark, tarry, stools. He stated the first episode occurred last week, but it was only a small amount after he had eaten a dinner of beets and beef. The episode today was accompanied by nausea, sweating, and weakness. He states he has had some mid epigastric pain for several weeks and has been taking OTC antacids. The most likely diagnosis is upper GI bleed which won’t be confirmed until further endoscopic procedures are performed.
Question:
1. What are the variables here that contribute to an upper GI bleed?

QUESTION 5
1. Scenario 4: Diverticulitis
A 54-year-old schoolteacher is seeing your today for complaints of passing bright red blood when she had a bowel movement this morning. She stated the first episode occurred last week. The episode today was accompanied by nausea, sweating, and weakness. She states she has had some LLQ pain for several weeks but described it as “coming and going”. She says she has had a fever and abdominal cramps that have worsened this morning.
Diagnosis is lower GI bleed secondary to diverticulitis.
Question:
1. What can cause diverticulitis in the lower GI tract?

The concepts of epidemiology and nursing research

Write a paper (2,000-2,500 words) in which you apply the concepts of epidemiology and nursing research to a communicable disease. Refer to “Communicable Disease Chain,” “Chain of Infection,” and the CDC website for assistance when completing this assignment.

Communicable Disease Selection

Chickenpox
Tuberculosis
Influenza
Mononucleosis
Hepatitis B
HIV
Ebola
Measles
Polio
Influenza
Epidemiology Paper Requirements

Describe the chosen communicable disease, including causes, symptoms, mode of transmission, complications, treatment, and the demographic of interest (mortality, morbidity, incidence, and prevalence). Is this a reportable disease? If so, provide details about reporting time, whom to report to, etc.

Describe the social determinants of health and explain how those factors contribute to the development of this disease.
Discuss the epidemiologic triangle as it relates to the communicable disease you have selected. Include the host factors, agent factors (presence or absence), and environmental factors. Are there any special considerations or notifications for the community, schools, or general population?

Explain the role of the community health nurse (case finding, reporting, data collection, data analysis, and follow-up) and why demographic data are necessary to the health of the community.

Identify at least one national agency or organization that addresses the communicable disease chosen and describe how the organizations contribute to resolving or reducing the impact of the disease.

Discuss a global implication of the disease. How is this addressed in other countries or cultures? Is this disease endemic to a particular area?

Developing an Academic and Professional Network

Week 1 | Part 1: Developing an Academic and Professional Network

I have identified and secured the participation of the following academic (at least two) and professional (at least two) individuals and/or teams to form the basis of my network. This network will help me to clarify my vision for success and will help guide me now and in the future.

Directions: Complete the information below for each member of your network. For more than four entries repeat the items below with details of your additional network member(s) in the ‘ADDITIONAL NETWORK MEMBERS’ section.Please fill out the notes section on the 4 individuals on how they can help me succeed in the Master’s Program for the Nurse Practitioner. Each notes section needs 7 to 10 sentences on each person. I gave an example in the first network name on how it should be done. I named each person the title and how they can help just elaborate more for each of the 4 individuals.

NETWORK MEMBER 1

Name: Janelle Cantu

Title: Enrollment Specialist

Organization: Walden University

Academic or Professional: Academic

Why I selected this individual and/or team and how they will support my success in the MSN program and as a practicing nurse:

Notes: I chose her to help with the success in the MSN program because she is my enrollment specialist. Janelle helped make the enrollment process a smooth transition especially since I have not been in school since 2017. She helped me get started in this program from the very beginning. Explaining all of the benefits of the masters program here at Walden. She helped me to identify financial aid, grants, and discounts that would apply to me. This was very helpful to me since I’m paying out of pocket for my masters program. She also assures that my assignments are in on time, enroll in classes, and staying on tasks daily. She communicates very efficiently through phone or email whenever I have any needs about my program.

NETWORK MEMBER 2

Name: Jazmine Jordan

Title: RN Coworker

Organization: Emory

Academic or Professional: Professional

Why I selected this individual and/or team and how they will support my success in the MSN program and as a practicing nurse:

Notes: This is a friend that is also in the program at Walden University for Nurse practicioner. We are going through the program together to get our degree.

NETWORK MEMBER 3

Name: Janae Mitchell

Title: RN BSN Educator

Organization: Grady

Academic or Professional: Academic

Why I selected this individual and/or team and how they will support my success in the MSN program and as a practicing nurse:

Notes: She can help guide me because she is a nurse educator.

NETWORK MEMBER 4

Name: Jamari Haynes

Title: MSN Nurse Practicioner

Organization: EMory

Academic or Professional: Professional

Why I selected this individual and/or team and how they will support my success in the MSN program and as a practicing nurse:

Notes: This a person that can help because they already hold a title on Nurse practitioners can help me with work and guidance through the program

Pathophysiology of acute renal failure in rhabdomyolysis

Pathophysiology of acute renal failure in rhabdomyolysis

A 28-year-old male presents to the primary care office for evaluation of left calf pain, swelling, and redness. He reports that this started one day ago and worsened today. He ran a 27-mile marathon 2 days ago and traveled for 3 hours in a car today.

He reports slight pain on walking and a swollen red calf. He took Ibuprofen 600 mg twice today without relief. Patient reports being an experienced runner, running 3-5 miles daily. He trained for the marathon for 4 months. The patient also reports a history of exercise-induced asthma and uses albuterol sulfate HFA as needed.

On physical exam, the patient appears in good health T 99 P 68 R 18 BP 118/78 wt. 175 lb, height 72 in. BMI 23.1. Heart rate is regular without murmurs, rubs, or gallops. Lungs clear bilaterally. HEENT WNL. Strength lower extremities 5 and DTRs 2. Left calf erythematous, edematous, warm, and tender on palpation. Pulses 3

  • Two possible diagnoses were considered: deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and rhabdomyolysis.
  • ordered Stat ultrasound of left leg to rule out DVT  and read as normal
  • CBC WNL
  • Creatine Kinase (CK) 23,000 U/L (normal 24-170 U/L)
  • BUN and Creatinine WNL
  • A diagnosis of rhabdomyolysis was made.Discuss the pathophysiology of acute renal failure in rhabdomyolysis.