Explain Leaman’s controversial argument
Explain Leaman’s controversial argument that describes how non-disruptive cheating is not only morally permissible in sport but also is morally laudable.
In sport, moral identity has shown to deter athletes from cheating. Moral identity is strongly negatively associated with anti-social behaviours, such as injuring an opponent and breaking the rules (Sage et al., 2006. (2006).
The only way cheating can be justified is if the reasons behind the actions matter to you as a couple (or to you as an individual). Some people find the act of cheating unforgivable, regardless of the reasons behind it. Others consider all the factors. It all boils down to your personal feelings.
Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!